欢迎来到第壹文秘! | 帮助中心 分享价值,成长自我!
第壹文秘
全部分类
  • 幼儿/小学教育>
  • 中学教育>
  • 高等教育>
  • 研究生考试>
  • 外语学习>
  • 资格/认证考试>
  • 论文>
  • IT计算机>
  • 法律/法学>
  • 建筑/环境>
  • 通信/电子>
  • 医学/心理学>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 第壹文秘 > 资源分类 > DOCX文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    sample-of-summary-writing.docx

    • 资源ID:1062103       资源大小:11.76KB        全文页数:2页
    • 资源格式: DOCX        下载积分:5金币
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    三方登录下载: 微信开放平台登录 QQ登录
    下载资源需要5金币
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    快捷下载时,如果您不填写信息,系统将为您自动创建临时账号,适用于临时下载。
    如果您填写信息,用户名和密码都是您填写的【邮箱或者手机号】(系统自动生成),方便查询和重复下载。
    如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,免费下载
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    sample-of-summary-writing.docx

    ChiIdrenMustbeTaughttoTellRijhtfromWrOnaWilliamKiIPaIyiCkManyoftoday'syoungpeoplehaveadifllcul(tin>eseeinganymoraldimens沁nC苴核层面)u>theiractions.ITicrcarcanumberofreasonswhythat'strue,butnonemoreprominentthanafailedsystemofeducationthateschews(回避)teachingchildrenthetraditionalmoralvaluesthatbindAmericanstogetherasasocietyandaCUIUlN.Thatfoiledapproach,called4tdecision-makingwasintroducedinschools25yearsago.ItIelkchiIdivntodecideforIhcniselveswhatisrightandwhatiswrong.Itreplacedcharactereducation.(IrWItrCharactereducationdidn'taskchildrentoreinventthemoralwheel(奢侈时间取新独创早已存在的itt德标准:instead,itencouragedthemtopracticehabitsofcourage,justiceandSdCCong1.Inthe1940s.whenacharactereducationapproachprevailed.IeaCherSworriedabouts(ude11(sCheWinggum;todaytheyworryaboutrobberyandrape.Decision-makingcurriculumsposethorny(麻烦的)ethicaldilcm11ustostudents,leavingthemwiththeimpressionthatallmoralityisproblematicsiVdIhalallquestionsofrightandwrongarcindispute.Youngstersarcforcedtoquestionvaluesandvirtuesthey'veneveracquiredinIhCfirsiplaceoruponwhichIheyhaveonlyatenuous(得弱的)hold.Tbeassump(ionbehind(hismeh<xlisthatSIlldeIigwillarrivea(goodnoralconclusionsifonlytheyarcgiventhechance.Buttheactualresultismoralconfusion.Forexample,arecentnationalstudyof1,700sixth-toninth-gradersrevealedthatamajorityofboysconsideredrape(obeacceptableunderce11ainconditions.Astoundingly,manyof(hegirlsagreed.Thiskindofmoralilliteracyisfurtherencouragedby、IaIueS<ducain(价值观教化,programsthatareIiulemorellncoursesinsc)f-esleen('i尊).ThesePrOgnHnSarebasedonthequestionableassumptionthatachildwhofeelsgoodaboutIiimsclforherselfwon,twanttodoanythingwrong.Butitisjustasreasonabletomakeanoppositeassumption:na11ly.thatachildWhOhasuncriticalself-vgardwillconcludethatheorsheCaffldoanythingbad.Suchnaiveself-acceptanceresultsinlargepartfromthenon-dircctivc(无指导性的)>n-judgmenlal(无是非观的as-long-as-you-cclcomi*<>rtablc-with-your-choiccsmentality(ffi)thathasPCrVaded(清透)PUbliCeducationforIhelastIWoandone-halfdecades.Manyoftoday,sdrugeducation,sexeducationandvalues>cducationcoursesarebasedonthesame1960sphilosophythathelpedfueltheexplosioninteendruguseandsexualactivityinthefirstplace.Meanwhile,whileeducatorsarcstillfiddlingwith(胡乱探布)outdated*icclgood,approaches.NewYork.Washington,and1.osAngeIeSareburning.YoungstersareleavingschoolbelievingthatnuersofrightandWn)ngarcalwaysmerelysubjective.IfyoupassastrangerontheSIreCtanddecidetomurderhimbecauseyouneedmoneyifitfeelsrightyougowiththatf<xling.Clearly,murderisnottaughtinourSChCX)Is.hutsuchaconclusionjusaboutanyconclusion-canbereachedandjustifiedusingthedecision-makingInClh(X1.histime(oconsign(寄出)Ihefads(风尚)of,Mccision-making'*and°nonjudgmcntalisntotheashheapof!ailedpolicies,andreturnIoaprovedmelhd.Charactereducationprovidesamuchnx)rerealisticapproachIomoralformation.Itisbuiltonanunderstandingthatwelearnnwralitynotbydebatingitbutbypracticingit.Summaryof''ChildrenMustbeIaughttoTellRightfromWrong”Inhisessay“ChildrenMUSlbeTaUghl【oTellRighlfromWrong."WilIiarnKilPaIriCkargueshallhc“decision-making"approachtothemoraleducaionofAmericanyouth,whichreplaced''charactereducation''25yearsago,haspreventedjuvenilesfrombehavingandthinkinginaccordancewiththetraditionalmoralprinciples(hatarefundamentaltoAmericansociety.ACCOrdingloKiIpaKick,decision-makingmchodsinstillinstudentsawrongbeliefthatallnormsofmoralityaresubjectiveconstructswithonlyrelativetruthinthemandIhcreibrecanbeintcretcdflexiblyandevenquestioned.ThiSbeliefdeprivesthemofthechancetosecuresolidmoralstandardsandcausesmisconceptionsaboutvhalshouldheclearlyrighorwrong.InDarallelWiththisinadequacyOfthe“decision-making"approacharetheunexpectedoutcomesofIhOSCVaIUCS-CdUCaliCnPrOgnin1$focusingOnstudents'Self-esteemthatsupportthe44non-judgmenta,mindsetdominating“decision-making“curriculums.ThCirHiisiakcnassumpionthatfeelinggoodwarrantsmoralityexcusesstudentsfromcriticizinganddiscipliningtheirownbehaviors.BaSinghisCOnCIlISionOnhisanalysisOfIhefundamenlalflawsOfthedccisicn-makingapproach,Kilpalrickfinallyproposesanimmediateshiftbacktocharactereducationwhichhebelievesteachesmoralitymoreeffectivelybyemphasizingpracticeinsteadofdiscussion.

    注意事项

    本文(sample-of-summary-writing.docx)为本站会员(p**)主动上传,第壹文秘仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知第壹文秘(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

    温馨提示:如果因为网速或其他原因下载失败请重新下载,重复下载不扣分。




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2023 1wenmi网站版权所有

    经营许可证编号:宁ICP备2022001189号-1

    本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。第壹文秘仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知第壹文秘网,我们立即给予删除!

    收起
    展开